CI
Calumet, Inc. /DE (CLMT)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 revenue outperformed while earnings quality was mixed: sales of $0.994B beat S&P Global consensus ($0.891B) by ~$102M; S&P “Primary EPS” of -$0.67 was a slight miss vs -$0.66, and S&P EBITDA was materially below consensus given large RINs and refinancing items (see Estimates Context). GAAP results: net loss -$162.0M and basic EPS -$1.87, with Adjusted EBITDA $38.1M and Adjusted EBITDA with Tax Attributes $55.0M . Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Strategic catalysts advanced: first $782M DOE draw funded in February, $110M Royal Purple industrial sale closed in April, and a $150M partial call of 2026 notes was launched (May 24 redemption date). Quarter‑end liquidity was $542.7M .
- Renewables: management unveiled a cheaper/faster SAF expansion—120–150M gallons by Q2 2026 for $20–$30M of capital, leveraging debottlenecking vs. major new equipment—while maintaining the long‑term goal of 300M gallons by 2028 .
- Cost discipline: company‑wide operating costs fell >$22M YoY; SPS and PB both delivered YoY Adjusted EBITDA growth despite a seasonally weak quarter and tight WCS-WTI spreads .
- Near-term stock reaction catalysts: RVO/PTC/BTC regulatory clarity, acceleration to selling 50M gpy of SAF “this summer,” execution on $150M note redemption, and potential additional deleveraging actions .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- SPS strength and PB growth: SPS Adjusted EBITDA rose to $56.3M (from $47.2M YoY) on strong specialty volumes and fixed cost reductions; PB Adjusted EBITDA increased to $15.8M (from $13.4M) driven by 7% volume growth and TruFuel momentum .
- Breakthrough SAF expansion plan: “For $20–$30 million of capital, we expect to increase our SAF capacity to 120–150 million gallons by the second quarter of 2026,” materially lowering near‑term capex and pulling forward timing (quote: CEO) .
- Balance sheet actions: $782M DOE tranche funded, $110M Royal Purple industrial sale closed, and $150M partial call of 2026 notes initiated at par; quarter‑end liquidity was $542.7M .
-
What Went Wrong
- GAAP loss widened: net loss -$162.0M included sizable RINs mark‑to‑market loss (+$86.8M expense), debt extinguishment costs ($47.6M), and a $62.2M gain on business sale; EBITDA per S&P was negative in the quarter (see Estimates Context) . Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Renewables margins still soft ex‑tax attributes: MR Adjusted gross profit remained negative (-$8.2M) amid seasonally weak fuels/asphalt and tight WCS-WTI, though MR Adjusted EBITDA with Tax Attributes improved to $3.3M vs. -$13.4M YoY .
- Logistics headwind: management cited rail congestion out of Q4 turnaround, limiting renewable throughput (10.3 kbpd; below target), though they expect SAF sales to increase late Q2 2025 as logistics normalize .
Financial Results
Consolidated metrics (chronological: oldest → newest):
Non-GAAP tax-attribute metric (y/y view where applicable):
Q1 2025 vs S&P Global consensus (all values S&P Global; asterisk denotes S&P data):
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Segment performance – Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024:
Operating KPIs (Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024):
Drivers and notable non‑GAAP items (Q1 2025):
- RINs mark‑to‑market (gain) loss: +$86.8M expense (reducing GAAP EBITDA); RINs incurrence expense add‑back: $30.4M .
- Debt extinguishment costs: $47.6M; Gain on sale of business: $62.2M .
- MR PTC “tax attributes” added to Adjusted EBITDA: $16.9M .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategic positioning: “We closed – and received funding – of our DOE loan… setting the stage for transformational growth in our Renewables business… and we’re announcing a plan to accelerate the MaxSAF expansion… increase our SAF capacity to 120 to 150 million gallons by the second quarter of 2026 for $20 million to $30 million of capital.” — CEO .
- Cost and demand: “Operating costs were reduced by over $22 million… We sold roughly 23,000 barrels per day of specialty products… among the best sales volume quarters on record, and Performance Brands volume grew 7% year over year.” — CEO .
- Renewables profitability lens: “The new non-GAAP metric of adjusted EBITDA plus tax attributes adds back [PTC]… we’ll report an EBITDA with tax attributes that includes the PTCs generated… to reflect the steady value generation of the business.” — CFO .
Q&A Highlights
- PTC/BTC framework and non‑GAAP: Management adopted “Adjusted EBITDA + tax attributes” to align comparability across BTC (2024) and PTC (2025) environments and avoid quarter-to-quarter volatility from PTC monetization timing .
- Balance sheet actions and targets: DOE funding reduces annual cash service by ~$(80)M; $150M partial redemption of 2026s launched; ultimate goal remains ~$800M restricted debt, with Montana Renewables’ partial monetization targeted around 2026 subject to market/regulatory clarity .
- MaxSAF capex/timing reset: Debottlenecking existing reactor enables 120–150M gpy by Q2 2026 for $20–$30M; Tranche 2 DOE construction draws expected as conditions are fulfilled; spend back‑half weighted in 2025 .
- Intercompany mechanics: Intercompany payable from MRL to Calumet reduced to ~$375M by quarter‑end after DOE Tranche 1; MRL to pay ~$(27–30)M interest to Calumet annually; considering pari secured debt at MRL to accelerate paydown .
- Operations/logistics: Rail congestion post‑turnaround constrained renewable volumes in Q1; plan to sell ~50M gpy of SAF ratably starting summer 2025 .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 vs S&P Global consensus: Revenue beat ($993.9M vs $891.4M estimate); S&P Primary EPS slight miss (-$0.67 vs -$0.66); S&P EBITDA materially below consensus (actual -$71.4M vs $43.5M estimate), reflecting GAAP items including RINs mark‑to‑market and extinguishment costs that management backs out in non‑GAAP. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Implication: Street models likely need to (a) reflect the company’s new reporting convention (Adjusted EBITDA + tax attributes) for Renewables comparability in a PTC regime; (b) re‑baseline near‑term capex lower for MaxSAF “150” step; and (c) incorporate higher SAF sales cadence from late Q2 2025 alongside deleveraging actions (partial note redemption).
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Revenue resilience amid tough margin backdrops underscores Specialties’ stability; SPS/PB YoY EBITDA growth and >$22M cost cuts highlight execution .
- Renewables inflection lever reset: the $20–$30M “MaxSAF 150” step (Q2 2026) accelerates SAF capacity for a fraction of prior capex, preserving the 300M gpy 2028 goal .
- Deleveraging underway: $782M DOE funding cut annual cash service by ~$(80)M; $150M 2026 notes partial redemption launched; additional asset optimization optionality remains .
- Near‑term catalysts: regulatory clarity (RVO/PTC/BTC), ramp to ~50M gpy SAF sales starting late Q2 2025, and potential pari debt at MRL to accelerate intercompany paydown .
- Modeling nuance: S&P EBITDA miss reflects GAAP charges; management’s “Adjusted EBITDA + tax attributes” better maps Renewables’ cash economics under PTC—adjust models accordingly (see segment tables) .
- Watch logistics normalization: rail issues weighed on Q1 renewables volumes; management expects improvement and higher SAF sell‑through into summer .
- Longer‑term: Montana Renewables partial monetization targeted when market/regulatory boxes are checked (potential 2026), against a lower‑cost, earlier SAF capacity pathway .
Citations:
- Q1 2025 press release and exhibits (financials, segments, liquidity, redemption):
- Q1 2025 earnings call transcript (strategy, PTC accounting, SAF plan, liquidity, intercompany, logistics):
- Prior quarters for trend: Q4 2024 PR/call ; Q3 2024 PR/call
- DOE/asset sale press releases:
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*